Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention (Russian Federation) ; 21(2):95-99, 2022.
Article in Russian | Scopus | ID: covidwho-1744547

ABSTRACT

The spread and consequences of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19) pandemic are currently one of the most pressing public health challenges in the world. Despite the fact that experience accumulates in the treatment and monitoring of COVID19 patients, certain aspects are still a clinical dilemma. In particular, this regarded the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) during the pandemic, both as a symptomatic treatment of infection, and in patients with comorbidities requiring NSAID. A series of studies did not establish evidence of the risk of infection and complications from NSAID therapy in COVID19. At the same time, the practitioner should take into account the risk of specific NSAIDassociated complications, which also remain relevant during the COVID19 pandemic. This resolution focuses on the evolution of ideas about NSAID use and safety in COVID19, and also emphasizes the particular relevance of their use for a number of clinical situations. © 2022 Vserossiiskoe Obshchestvo Kardiologov. All rights reserved.

2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(11): e4179-e4188, 2021 12 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1561122

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may exacerbate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and worsen associated outcomes by upregulating the enzyme that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) binds to in order to enter cells. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using South Korea's nationwide healthcare database, which contains data for all individuals who received a COVID-19 test (n = 69 793) as of 8 April 2020. We identified adults hospitalized with COVID-19, where cohort entry was the date of hospitalization. NSAID users were those prescribed NSAIDs in the 7 days before and including cohort entry, and nonusers were those not prescribed NSAIDs during this period. Our primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital death, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation use, and sepsis; our secondary outcomes were cardiovascular complications and acute renal failure. We conducted logistic regression analysis to estimate odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using inverse probability of treatment weighting to minimize confounding. RESULTS: Of 1824 adults hospitalized with COVID-19 (mean age, 49.0 years; female, 59%), 354 were NSAID users and 1470 were nonusers. Compared with nonuse, NSAID use was associated with increased risks of the primary composite outcome (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.13-2.11) but insignificantly associated with cardiovascular complications (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.96-2.48) or acute renal failure (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.49-4.14). CONCLUSIONS: While awaiting the results of confirmatory studies, we suggest NSAIDs be used with caution for COVID-19 patients as the harms associated with their use may outweigh their benefits.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization , Humans , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Pharmacotherapy ; 40(9): 970-977, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-676739

ABSTRACT

There have been concerns regarding the safety of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients with respiratory infections. However, to date, the quality of the evidence has not been systematically assessed. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the role of NSAIDs on pneumonia complications. OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Google Scholar were searched. Studies that examined pneumonia complications in patients who had taken NSAIDs before onset of symptoms were identified. Quality assessment was conducted using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tool, which was adapted to include biases that were pertinent to this question. The search strategy identified 1721 potential studies through the 5 primary databases and searching reference lists. Of these, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 5 nested case-control studies, 2 population-based case-control studies, and 3 cohort studies. In total, 59,724 adults were included from 4 of the studies (range = 57-59,250) and 1217 children from 5 studies (range = 148-540). All studies demonstrated a positive association; in adults (odds ratio/risk ratio range = 1.8-8.1) and children (odds ratio/risk ratio range = 1.9-6.8). Studies were limited by moderate or serious risk of confounding bias, exposure misclassification, and protopathic biases and sparse data bias. The results of this review demonstrate that published studies on the effect of NSAIDs use and risk of pneumonia complications are subject to a number of biases. These results should not be extrapolated as evidence of harm for NSAIDs, including ibuprofen, in respiratory ailments but highlight the need for more methodologically robust studies to evaluate this potential relationship.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Pneumonia/etiology , Research Design , Adult , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Bias , Child , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Humans , Pneumonia/epidemiology , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL